Job Posting: TT Assistant Professor of English, Postcolonial Literature and Digital Humanities, Wilkes University
Applicants should submit a cover letter, CV, teaching philosophy, and three letters of reference by November 30th, 2017 to the following:https://wilkesuniversitycareers.applicantpro.com/pages/jobshome/. Interviews will be conducted at the 2018 MLA conference in New York. Alternative arrangements will be made for candidates who are unable to attend MLA.
Job Posting: Visiting Assistant Professor (Global Literatures, Spring 2018) Stockton University: https://stockton.hiretouch.com/job-details?jobID=1401&job=visiting-assistant-professor-of-literature
Stockton University seeks applications for a Spring Term 2018 full-time Visiting Assistant Professor position (one semester replacement) in Global Literatures of any period with a specialization in comparative studies of literatures structured or informed by colonial and imperial relations.
We encourage applications from candidates with interests in colonialism, imperialism, anti-colonial and anti-imperial resistance, their corresponding literary genres and cultural media.
- Teaching load is three four-hour courses.
- Teach two literature courses in their area of specialization.
- Teach one course focused on culture and representation in the University’s General Studies program.
- All Stockton faculty members are expected to demonstrate, through past accomplishments and actions, the ability to support Stockton University’s diversity commitment and strong student-centered vision and mission.
Ph.D. or ABD status in English, Comparative Literature, or related field at time of appointment required.
ABD candidates are encouraged to apply
CFP: Reclaiming the Irish Girl’s Presence in New England Literature, Women of the Green Atlantic Conference (Deadline 10.27.2017)
“Where’s Nora?” Reclaiming the Irish Girl’s Presence in New England literature
A panel organized by Cécile Roudeau (Université Paris Diderot) and Stephanie Palmer (Nottingham Trent University) and sponsored by the Mary E. Wilkins Freeman Society for submission to the Transatlantic Women 3: Women of the Green Atlantic Conference at the Royal Irish Academy in Dublin, Ireland, June 21-22, 2018.
Taking the title of one of Sarah Orne Jewett’s story as its tagline, this panel starts with a simple constatation: in nineteenth century New England literature, Nora, Bridget, Erin and other Irish girls were an ubiquitous presence. They popped in and out of New England sketches— from Louisa May Alcott’s “Work” (1873) to Elizabeth Stuart Phelps’s “The Tenth of January” (1868) to Sarah Orne Jewett’s “A Little Captive Maid” (1893) or “Elleneen” (1901). And yet, ubiquitous as she is, the Irish girl is also conspicuously absent in major scholarly studies of New England literature. If “Bridget” or “Peggy” has received much-needed attention from historians and is central to discussions of diasporic identity in recent studies of Irish-American history and culture (Making the Irish American: History and Heritage of the Irish in the United States, 2006; The Irish Bridget, Irish Immigrant Women in Domestic Service in America, 2009, among others), she has remained a shadow in literary studies. Paradoxically so.
For more than two decades, following the pathbreaking work of Judith Fetterley, June Howard, Marjorie Pryse, Susan Gillman, Sandra Zagarell, and more recently Patrick Gleason and Rebecca Walsh, questions of gender, race, and empire have redesigned the approaches to American letters, and the corpus of New England women’s literature in particular. As a “problem,” the Irish girl sits at the center of questions of political and poetical representation, of transactions of gender, race and class. But where’s Nora in our readings of New England women writers? Nourishing nativist fears and religious anxieties while being also praised as “a valuable element in the new race” (Margaret Fuller, “The Irish Character,” 1845), the Irish girl, whose propensity to serve was both an asset and a liability to her becoming American, proved a challenge to the mystique of American democracy and a symptom of its colonialist penchants. Racialized, minoritized as an unfortunate victim of a belated feudalism, she was a foil to the “mistress”’s femininity, a threat to the household’s racial homogeneity, and a constant challenge to domestic government. She was also key to a forbidden imaginery, that of Catholicism, of the illicit realm of poetry (Harriet Prescott Spofford, The Servant Girl Question, 1881). It is high time to acknowledge her stubborn, disquieting, and terribly appealing, presence.
This panel argues that the Irish girl is part of the shadows that matter in American literature. Papers may inquire into:
– reading well-known or lesser known texts by New England women writers from the perspective of the Irish girl, however marginal a character she may seem to be. (Catharine Beecher, Lydia Sigourney, Louisa May Alcott, Louise Imogen Guiney, Rose Terry Cooke, Harriet Prescott Spofford, Mary E. Wilkins Freeman, Sarah Orne Jewett….)
– Tracing the presence of the Irish girl as a problem, or a question, across genres (essays, poems, domestic manuals, political pamphlets, labor novels, diaries, travel narratives, but also vaudeville, plays, caricatures…); the Irish girl in New England periodicals (Boston Transcript, The Atlantic Monthly…).
– “Avenging Bridget”: contemporary subversive rewritings of the stereotype; giving back a voice, a gaze, to the absentee (Aife Murray, Maid as Muse: How Servants Changed Emily Dickinson’s Life and Language, 2010; Nuala O’Connor, Miss Emily, 2015; Maeve Brennan’s The Rose Garden, 2001…)
Leah Blatt Glasser (Mount Holyoke College) will chair the panel.
Please send 300-word abstracts for papers and a short bio to Cécile Roudeau and Stephanie Palmer at email@example.com and firstname.lastname@example.org by October 27. The conference abstract deadline is November 1, 2017.
CFP: Legacy, Special Issue: “American Women’s Writing and the Genealogies of Queer Thought” (Deadline: 07.31.2018)
Special Issue: “American Women’s Writing and the Genealogies of Queer Thought”
Guest Editors: Travis M. Foster and Timothy M. Griffiths
By addressing these questions, papers collected in this issue might aspire to suggest fields germane to queer theoretical study that otherwise go overlooked; clarify the overlaps and disconnects between the histories of feminist and queer literary studies; decenter gay-white-male iconicity in the study of queer-American culture; and/or expand notions of queer dissent emerging from archives that too often valorize masculinist, anti-relational alienation from “effeminizing,” “bourgeois” sociality. We list these conceptual ambitions as possibilities rather than prescriptions. On a more fundamental and open level, this issue acts as an occasion to circulate scholarship that generates new thinking on queerness and gender by highlighting a wide range of American women’s writing.
- Possible topics include, but are not limited to:
- Sexual transgression and its theoretics in women’s writing
- The relationship between queer thought and the sentimental and domestic traditions
- Early African American writing, black queer studies, and women-of-color feminism
- Ecofeminism, environmentalism, and queer ecology
- Sex and gender in Native American writing
- The linkages between sexual identity, gender performance, and theories of sovereignty
- Anti-imperialism and nationalism as they relate to sex and gender in women’s writing
- Women and queerness beyond lesbian recovery paradigms
- Heterosexuality as an ideology in women’s writing
- The queer ethics of caretaking and sympathy
- Women-authored poetry and its erotic imagination
- Forms of dissent, subversion, and sexual identity in women’s writing
- American religion, religious ecstasy, and sexual identity
- Gender and sexuality in the study of whiteness
- Women’s writing and critiques of antinormativity
- Queerness and anti-queerness in abolitionist literature
- Women and queerness beyond “romantic friendship” paradigms
Submissions of 8000–10,000 words (including endnotes and works cited) in MLA format are due by July 31, 2018. Accepted submissions will appear in Legacy 37.1 (Summer 2020). Please send electronic submissions and any inquiries to the guest editors: Timothy M. Griffiths (email@example.com) and Travis M. Foster (firstname.lastname@example.org).
CFP: Arizona Quarterly Special Issue: Medical Women in 19th-Century American Literature (Deadline: 12.15.2018)
Arizona Quarterly: A Journal of American Literature, Culture, and Theory
Special Issue: Medical Women in 19th-Century American Literature
This special issue of Arizona Quarterly seeks essays that engage with literature containing medical women or women in the sciences in 19th-century America. In the midst of a controversy between William Lloyd Garrison and the Gynecological Society of Boston, the Society referred to women physicians, or “skirted practitioners,” as a “third sex,” as inhabiting a space somehow between or outside the male/female gender binary. Despite the Gynecological Society’s intent at harm, their claim can be reinterpreted as a description of the way 19th-century women in the sciences transgress gender binaries by inhabiting a queer, third, liminal space—a space that resists restrictive categorizations.
These are women who transgress the boundary between the private and the public, between the female space and the male dominated one. Perhaps a way to reinterpret the Gynecological Society’s negative othering is to suggest that these 19th-century American women physicians represent a queer, transgressive, and liminal space between the physical and ideological female-inhabited domestic space and the male-dominated professional space.
How, then, do texts with medical women grapple with transgressed categories on both the formal and the thematic level? How does 19th-century American literature register the “third” space women in the sciences inhabit? What do we learn from reading literature with medical women as characters or authors?
To address this issue of formal and thematic transgression, authors might pursue issues such as the following, though they should not feel limited by them:
- How novels with women physicians or scientists transgress generic or formal boundaries
- Approaches that queer medical women in literature; analyses of queering and medical women
- Interdisciplinary approaches to 19th-century characterizations of women and medicine
- How literature with medical women works to disrupt social and literary forms
- 19th-century works that explore the intersections between gender, sex, and medicine
- Genre analyses of novels of sentimentalism, realism, or regionalism with medical or scientific women characters
- Spatial or visual representations of 19th-century medical women or women in science
- Pedagogical approaches to teaching 19th-century texts with medical women
Topics other than those listed above are enthusiastically encouraged, and articles on a broad range of issues and topics that fall within the broad project of women in medicine or science and literature will be considered.
Please send 500 word abstracts and a brief bio to Margaret Jay Jessee email@example.com by December 15. Completed essays will be due in March 2018 for review.
Call for Proposals: C19 Podcast Episodes
C19: The Society of Nineteenth-Century Americanists is pleased to announce the launch of an official C19 podcast. The podcast will be a stage for public scholarship on American literature, history, and culture that can engage an audience of C19 members, students, alt-ac professionals, researchers, teachers, librarians, enthusiasts, and the public at large. We invite proposals for individual podcast episodes. Submissions are open and will be considered on a rolling basis to accommodate for applicants’ work schedules and to allow for episode proposals in response to current or developing events. The committee will meet to evaluate the submissions three times a year. (See below for submission details)
No previous experience podcasting required. Resources and guides will be provided by the C19 Podcast Subcommittee.
We seek proposals on any topic relating to long nineteenth-century American literature, culture, and history. Episode topics might include
– Archival discoveries;
– Discussions of new books in the field, new scholarly trends, or new J19 issues;
– Appearances by granting agency officers or editors of journals or presses;
– Previews of upcoming conferences or symposia;
– Resources and/or workshops on conference proposals, writing a dissertation, or applying to a conference, or starting a new book project;
– Reports on academic activism, pedagogy, and inclusion, past and present;
– Considerations of current political, cultural, and social developments in the context of the nineteenth century;
– Discussions of pedagogical approaches
– Tips and resources for undergraduates, graduates, and/or NTT and junior faculty on navigating the academic or alt-ac landscape.
Possible formats may include narrative exposition, interviews, readings and analyses of underrepresented texts, and panel discussions. While individuals may produce episodes, we also encourage collaborative work. We invite submissions from all ranks including graduate students and non-tenure track faculty as well as collaborations between senior and junior scholars. Although the C19 Podcast Subcommittee will assign producers to help guide the technical development of episodes, applicants will be expected to produce their own audio files; any requirements for significant production assistance from the Subcommittee should be noted in the application.
Applications should include both a proposal and an appendix.
Proposals (max 300 words) should address the following:
● topic of the episode and its relevance; specific details strongly encouraged
o archival discoveries, discussions of new books, issues etc. should clearly frame their importance in relation to scholarly and cultural contexts
● the plan for adapting the topic to the podcast medium (30 min max episode) ● episode format (interview, narrative etc.) and an overview of the structure ● relevant scholarly and technical qualifications related to the subject.
Appendix (no longer than 1 page)
● list sample questions for interviews
● additional participants (if any)
● logistics in terms of access to resources, equipment, technical help
Please email applications and a CV (2 pages max) to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please place C19podcast along with the title of the proposal in the subject line of the email.
Questions? Contact Xine Yao, Subcommittee Chair (email@example.com).
CFP: Digital Poster Session Editorship as Collaboration at the American Antiquarian Society (Deadline 10.02.2017)
The title, print run (or selection) and a permanent link to the serial from the AAS Catalog.
A brief summary of the publication’s relevance to our focus on multiethnic editorship and collaboration. Proposals might address questions like: How are processes of collaboration illustrated or dramatized in this example? How does this publication focus on external or internal communities, and how does the paper, and its editors, understand the exchanges between such communities? What historical or archival contexts/difficulties/conditions structure your example?
A brief description of the purpose of this publication in this context. Why this publication? Why now? What makes this a productive example for a range of users from introductory students to archivists and scholars?
Please send your submission to Jim Casey (firstname.lastname@example.org) and Sarah Salter (email@example.com) as a Word document along with a short CV. Submissions should be received by Monday, Oct 2. Selected participants will be notified via email by the end of October. Final acceptance will be conditional on membership in the Research Society for American Periodicals.